{"id":"W2319317652","doi":"10.1139/f2011-169","title":"Diatom-inferred decline of macrophyte abundance in lakes of southern Quebec, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Macrophyte; Eutrophication; Biomass (ecology); Lake ecosystem; Paleolimnology; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Abundance (ecology); Diatom; Ecology; Alternative stable state; Aquatic ecosystem; Aquatic plant; Regime shift; Freshwater ecosystem; Nutrient; Hydrology (agriculture); Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003066009,0.0003098634,0.0002323233,0.0009778254,0.001045596,0.0007097488,0.0004830862,0.0002228513,0.00164986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001125146,0.0001763455,0.000206852,0.001619134,0.0003323453,0.0002402204,0.000342841,0.000203413,0.0001668145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01282285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006714191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998626,0.00001610761,0.00000649062,0.00003820877,0.00003836655,0.00003835517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993666,0.00007493843,0.00009712692,0.00001801068,0.0003560579,0.00008727009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001079756,0.00001647993,0.983099,0.00003909706,0.00007363969,0.00007316493,0.000497453,0.002579529,0.002184627,0.0000922572,0.001016711,0.01022005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006210252,0.000007420086,0.9935819,0.00001202557,0.00001650162,0.00001645609,0.0002822534,0.005085205,0.0001934468,0.0000191022,0.0007723075,0.000007244129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959558,0.0002573329,0.0003347965,0.00005881896,0.000002626244,0.0000123889,0.002139971,0.0000293384,0.001209051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981932,0.0000811615,0.0003351606,0.0000165012,9.870464e-7,0.000008214134,0.0008580566,0.00000498182,0.0005016411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01282285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09303671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008668048712064346,"score_gpt":0.1926397845572964,"score_spread":0.183971735845232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}