{"id":"W2319387299","doi":"10.2298/abs150911032k","title":"The effects of Douglas fir monoculture on stand characteristics in a zone of Montane beech forest","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives of Biological Sciences","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Biological Sciences","funders":"Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja","keywords":"Beech; Litter; Monoculture; Forest floor; Douglas fir; Environmental science; Biodiversity; Soil fertility; Old-growth forest; Forest ecology; Agronomy; Ecosystem; Ecology; Botany; Agroforestry; Soil water; Biology; Soil science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002480824,0.0002556508,0.0002315994,0.0003519926,0.0003470077,0.0004714053,0.000202302,0.0002485555,0.0006759479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003813583,0.0001255733,0.0002315627,0.0001834894,0.0003704478,0.0001464536,0.0002745706,0.0002064713,0.0001355906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005144991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002706585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007966271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02404302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998037,0.00006017497,0.00001405692,0.00005359786,0.00002331236,0.00004511481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994224,0.0001073303,0.0001445096,0.00003467568,0.00004501596,0.0002460801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040723,0.0006527388,0.7413467,0.00007812219,0.0002733622,0.001003669,0.0006851685,0.000414644,0.2442035,0.00007564775,0.0001320968,0.0070619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005540244,0.0003044873,0.9984512,0.000001450275,0.00001376999,0.00005357325,0.0001484284,0.0000962583,0.0008381086,0.000006651749,0.00007784009,0.0000026202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997959,0.00007713409,0.00001093234,0.000003807377,0.000001750626,0.00000125903,0.00002777672,0.000001122523,0.00008029318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997535,0.00003836529,0.00002782603,0.00001103942,0.000002687659,0.000001761748,0.00007145467,8.506923e-7,0.00009248658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007966271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01583982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007956685004969115,"score_gpt":0.2145594471398773,"score_spread":0.2066027621349082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}