{"id":"W2319447784","doi":"10.1139/l2012-038","title":"Optimum risk allocation model for construction contracts: fuzzy TOPSIS approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Risk management; Negotiation; Process (computing); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); TOPSIS; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Operations research; Fuzzy logic; Management science; Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002351264,0.0009293885,0.001291999,0.001851983,0.001138098,0.003413785,0.002268616,0.002221503,0.005867992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002606347,0.0006573573,0.001621334,0.001964758,0.0008805064,0.002314858,0.001354141,0.001190379,0.0005926845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002701577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003361712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01187156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01033126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998061,0.0007862951,0.0001001205,0.000215884,0.0006688696,0.0001677664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994521,0.000293811,0.00006623403,0.00001966326,0.0001435381,0.00002467737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004646465,0.00004275714,0.0002726114,0.0001320068,0.0000517356,0.000128065,0.0002774246,0.9197064,0.001246261,0.05722062,0.0008527623,0.0200229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001111667,0.00002234484,0.00006711388,0.00001566599,0.00001356375,0.00002551365,0.00006853863,0.9795319,0.0001718497,0.01934769,0.00071347,0.00001125404],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01287781,0.0002101809,0.9766468,0.000295811,0.00001991101,0.0001382616,0.00009993323,0.0001092898,0.009602113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6053388,0.0007449308,0.3845935,0.00009632915,0.00002973434,0.0008014782,0.0002385457,0.00004315541,0.008113609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01187156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02360487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04814154988124845,"score_gpt":0.2722476655642158,"score_spread":0.2241061156829674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}