{"id":"W2320422926","doi":"10.1080/13669877.2016.1154092","title":"Talking about risk-taking with potentially ‘problematic’ risk-takers: a study of preventive interactions under high uncertainty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk Research","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Psychology; Risk communication; Risk analysis (engineering); Actuarial science; Social psychology; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00986482,0.0001400139,0.0003568046,0.000664932,0.001066212,0.000185366,0.000564891,0.00006346729,0.0009421069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002780086,0.00008278486,0.0001597507,0.0007678056,0.0004182644,0.0006199751,0.0001440622,0.0008442714,0.00003143356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004777462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003602451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01697408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02548662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927603,0.003590616,0.0007275591,0.0002531021,0.002183052,0.0004853778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993784,0.001198404,0.003015037,0.0002943488,0.001499541,0.0002086549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002088314,0.004714773,0.265637,0.00009355308,0.002646837,0.0001141757,0.209961,0.01063113,0.0008305792,0.005115095,0.004906406,0.493261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00441704,0.002038746,0.6139944,0.001171551,0.0004290931,0.000008288931,0.3558796,0.0001117615,0.0000417519,0.01597161,0.005661463,0.0002747396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800195,0.00006096997,0.01560402,0.0009153004,0.0002480021,0.0007016025,0.00001421928,0.00001721479,0.002419154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936327,0.003321145,0.001651131,0.000007725506,0.000260727,0.00001735395,3.293909e-7,0.00001860931,0.001090297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4929863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07039725604738373,"score_gpt":0.4274187219174845,"score_spread":0.3570214658701008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}