{"id":"W2320576247","doi":"10.1139/x11-057","title":"A methodological analysis of canopy disturbance reconstructions using<i>Quercus alba</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Tree-ring climate responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alabama","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Canopy; Dendrochronology; Series (stratigraphy); Stand development; Tree (set theory); Environmental science; Tree canopy; Forestry; Mathematics; Ecology; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00555932,0.0002151223,0.0001577857,0.001298049,0.0007223784,0.0005931347,0.0004111351,0.0002071913,0.000457351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01395655,0.0001693815,0.0005956287,0.00136761,0.0004296057,0.0002734692,0.0005166944,0.0002391041,0.00008281157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006698217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006368185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01043787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02580662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965579,0.001832839,0.0003579109,0.0007499583,0.0004027037,0.00009865926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889437,0.004975413,0.002859815,0.002008862,0.001087937,0.0001242926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002028588,0.0001311272,0.8968413,0.0001637854,0.0007953749,0.0002128545,0.001032099,0.009182502,0.02179155,0.002410034,0.000640898,0.06659561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001922354,0.0002077707,0.9642814,0.00003127671,0.0001824293,0.0003493989,0.0007905092,0.02388058,0.00612164,0.000994787,0.003106967,0.00003398301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9468077,0.0001602759,0.050124,0.00006574726,0.00001361827,0.0001596311,0.0008374293,0.00006530819,0.001766342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.947306,0.00004406911,0.05135645,0.00002966373,0.000008024416,0.0001499605,0.0008794288,0.00002281431,0.0002035936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01043787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02940089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3515309486531953,"score_gpt":0.379532836239636,"score_spread":0.02800188758644062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}