{"id":"W2320686758","doi":"10.5558/tfc2015-024","title":"Understanding First Nations rights and perspectives on the use of herbicides in forestry: A case study from northeastern Ontario","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Treaty; First nation; Political science; Human rights; Environmentalism; Public administration; Environmental protection; Environmental ethics; Law; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002683163,0.00008687838,0.0001377639,0.0000553515,0.0001843497,0.00004562459,0.00009708821,0.00003175087,0.00008957788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003543046,0.00006314658,0.00002833833,0.00006932041,0.0001136758,0.0001973399,0.00005473818,0.0001077242,0.00002446421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000756324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002339636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1790675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5887157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993907,0.00002362098,0.0002474901,0.0001914109,0.00003239996,0.0001144243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993397,0.0002364345,0.0001372029,0.0002497451,0.000004333791,0.00003258411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002008095,0.0001559516,0.940579,0.000001897842,0.00003857997,0.00001168541,0.03202069,0.007925063,2.132626e-7,0.0191822,0.00005690145,0.000007710788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001708913,0.0003369955,0.8889144,0.00003395288,0.00001783246,0.0000266171,0.04706414,0.01617105,0.000008367017,0.04514557,0.0003894194,0.0001827221],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981647,0.0002404539,0.0001053518,0.000294479,0.00004053949,0.0003302518,0.00003175324,0.000005380734,0.0007870635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997717,0.00001105026,0.00003119985,0.00001816427,0.00002297511,0.00002118891,0.000003231242,0.000008293199,0.0001121741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4096482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8263991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3512643671923679,"score_gpt":0.2469213942151324,"score_spread":0.1043429729772355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}