{"id":"W2320688519","doi":"10.1061/9780784413272.303","title":"Comparison Between 3D Limit Equilibrium and Shear Strength Reduction Methodologies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geo-Congress 2014 Technical Papers","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"SoilVision Systems (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Finite element method; Limit analysis; Conservatism; Limit (mathematics); Static analysis; Strength reduction; Structural engineering; Shear (geology); Slope stability analysis; Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics; Geology; Slope stability; Mathematical analysis; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001112962,0.0006351183,0.0006066421,0.001991004,0.0003798675,0.001593692,0.001436371,0.0008476566,0.005393927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002069364,0.0005054539,0.001079296,0.0008018211,0.00066565,0.0009769957,0.001188981,0.0004139344,0.001262866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007067891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008670032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002138961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003648576,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988165,0.0002413691,0.00006616471,0.00007646484,0.0007565899,0.00004293091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988098,0.000341953,0.00009443507,0.0001899211,0.0005393343,0.00002458276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001360027,0.0001304633,0.003836545,0.0003986519,0.000108391,0.0001633373,0.0004343264,0.5831943,0.02478112,0.06683222,0.001931786,0.3180528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001704303,0.00008870273,0.001851995,0.00006404006,0.00002730961,0.0001748275,0.0001172994,0.9652893,0.008871548,0.01350511,0.009946729,0.00004613952],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03305799,0.0003916674,0.9450085,0.0001340662,0.00004124929,0.00006202684,0.0001483124,0.0009085825,0.02024752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4434693,0.00107376,0.5471119,0.0001567822,0.00004302487,0.0002858474,0.0005754957,0.0005835263,0.00670034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005393927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01804447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02515079310158704,"score_gpt":0.278223276762132,"score_spread":0.253072483660545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}