{"id":"W2320807527","doi":"10.1139/x2012-100","title":"Effects of restoration thinning on spatial heterogeneity in mixed-conifer forest","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thinning; Larch; Forest restoration; Common spatial pattern; Restoration ecology; Spatial ecology; Forestry; Forest ecology; Spatial heterogeneity; Ecology; Clearcutting; Silviculture; Stand development; Environmental science; Disturbance (geology); Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Spatial variability; Geography; Biology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006688002,0.0002339227,0.000298972,0.0002796766,0.0003802795,0.0003922032,0.0003472513,0.0001324744,0.0004682176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001087194,0.00008928162,0.0002165674,0.000197617,0.0004638501,0.0002030973,0.0003454239,0.0002712053,0.00004295326],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004762489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004422686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008876438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03356725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999519,0.0001408994,0.00003270372,0.0001171892,0.00008965073,0.0001006538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990088,0.0002613368,0.0002941617,0.0001247324,0.0001273913,0.0001835514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007681753,0.001900226,0.7183028,0.0002122769,0.0004975703,0.0007333552,0.0006285846,0.01130991,0.2006498,0.0004749398,0.0005018233,0.05710687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002114292,0.001088135,0.9891951,0.0000103727,0.00007223673,0.0001279688,0.0002741751,0.003561993,0.004965359,0.0001318679,0.0005439399,0.00000767868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993311,0.000108065,0.0001999233,0.000006619435,0.000003226572,0.000005682166,0.00003646471,0.000007188248,0.0003017637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995203,0.00002368505,0.0002601849,0.00001304535,0.000001748238,0.000004748852,0.00007470141,0.000002235498,0.00009920861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008876438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01764953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02919832731217462,"score_gpt":0.3052859394631053,"score_spread":0.2760876121509306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}