{"id":"W2320825822","doi":"10.2316/journal.203.2012.2.203-4909","title":"POWER FLOW ANALYSIS OF A POWER SYSTEM USING SIMPLIFIED NEWTON–RAPHSON METHOD","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Power and Energy Systems","topic":"Smart Grid Energy Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power flow; Newton's method; Electric power system; Power (physics); Flow (mathematics); Control theory (sociology); Power-flow study; Mathematics; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Mechanics; Physics; Nonlinear system; Thermodynamics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007772736,0.0002252535,0.0005877248,0.00112788,0.00003019849,0.00007872014,0.0003259502,0.0001055574,0.00007471415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002321535,0.0001977077,0.0003176175,0.0004201057,0.00002374917,0.0003874465,0.00006938737,0.000118618,0.000001546407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002483434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001768792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002046877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005729518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99785,0.000109559,0.0009055309,0.0001332362,0.0007246694,0.0002769815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987713,0.0001021028,0.0003699682,0.00020132,0.0003718873,0.0001834435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004887168,0.00005395926,0.004353994,0.00003904465,0.007788045,0.00003498088,0.000786976,0.9736906,0.00261234,0.009197243,0.001109739,0.0002841996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001562344,0.0001547841,0.02094243,0.0005872027,0.001789577,0.0007668287,0.003438028,0.8762599,0.002175679,0.00002149292,0.09154399,0.0007577761],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.316691,0.004333648,0.6495872,0.00005230363,0.0155768,0.00005660048,0.00004254389,0.00008068704,0.01357921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978013,0.0000440688,0.001588404,0.00002899506,0.0003535275,0.000002879538,0.000005750261,0.00003556732,0.0001395144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6811103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8062286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01083292616862507,"score_gpt":0.253847219146736,"score_spread":0.2430142929781109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}