{"id":"W2321358358","doi":"10.1086/658616","title":": <i>The Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish: Reason and Fancy during the Scientific Revolution</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Australian Indigenous Culture and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Natural philosophy; History; Scientific revolution; Index (typography); Politics; Art history; Environmental ethics; Philosophy of science; Natural (archaeology); Classics; Media studies; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001672101,0.0009168573,0.0005215051,0.001574428,0.003987156,0.003889687,0.001367915,0.003545947,0.01608551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002975069,0.0004413781,0.0003395178,0.002496598,0.006225501,0.009772546,0.002309842,0.003971596,0.003153434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004178284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002730555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02948498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07608071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993159,0.0002910217,0.00002674589,0.0001034843,0.0001948354,0.00006792751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998654,0.0008321615,0.0001185348,0.00004687019,0.0001701692,0.0001781825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001673802,0.000008365589,0.0001360801,0.0002040049,0.000003915566,0.00006156642,0.00352236,0.00001942059,0.0000482188,0.0203769,0.9607515,0.01485093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007916936,0.000009713882,0.001172895,0.0006039257,0.000005116825,0.0002249866,0.003647832,0.0000440334,0.000123953,0.01103699,0.9831055,0.00001716933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00194047,0.529736,0.0006781338,0.3799795,0.02257378,0.00003015602,0.0001265744,0.0000716881,0.06486356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1185634,0.3206189,0.001997043,0.1471465,0.04569476,0.0001613687,0.0002733854,0.0003631584,0.3651815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05862671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008534597910670603,"score_gpt":0.2441103784491956,"score_spread":0.235575780538525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}