{"id":"W2321459806","doi":"10.1149/1.3484651","title":"Evaluating Polymeric Materials as Potential Sources of PEMFC System Contaminants","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ECS Transactions","topic":"Fuel Cells and Related Materials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Proton exchange membrane fuel cell; Contamination; Durability; Electrolyte; Capital cost; Leaching (pedology); Fuel cells; Environmental science; Waste management; Operational costs; Materials science; Process engineering; Chemical engineering; Chemistry; Electrode; Composite material; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006195749,0.0005434704,0.0003271018,0.0006173972,0.0004094921,0.00060828,0.0003805896,0.0005919295,0.001186926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001512028,0.0002455712,0.0003888918,0.0005170031,0.0001942937,0.0006086413,0.0004421138,0.0003602555,0.0002821519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003278608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000256658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007400467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00109764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992556,0.0002383832,0.00005667187,0.00008228262,0.0002643894,0.0001025437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991192,0.0003271134,0.0001648803,0.00004956144,0.0003093062,0.00002989316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002452682,0.0001276376,0.001408438,0.000308798,0.0000270154,0.0001804624,0.00004707079,0.0008846279,0.9888471,0.00007787907,0.00003928758,0.007806318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003315577,0.000699438,0.000850489,0.000008296879,0.00003267056,0.00007468496,0.00003949932,0.000636763,0.9968709,0.00002561282,0.0007541291,0.000004130259],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929558,0.00200213,0.003155804,0.000058367,0.00001897496,0.00009833444,0.000201211,0.00002946954,0.001480003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848891,0.002984014,0.008806759,0.00004905538,0.00002462243,0.00009451498,0.0003416777,0.00002821786,0.002781953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001186926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003970683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00804066027594197,"score_gpt":0.2331426728049921,"score_spread":0.2251020125290501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}