{"id":"W2321482792","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2011.07.541","title":"651 A novel method for automatic quantification of myocardial infarct mass","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Histogram; Myocardial infarction; Standard deviation; Scars; Full width at half maximum; Nuclear medicine; Intensity (physics); Pattern recognition (psychology); Cardiology; Artificial intelligence; Surgery; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Optics; Image (mathematics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007637285,0.0006696695,0.0007588443,0.001782399,0.0004877887,0.001291638,0.00090175,0.001338011,0.003568889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009934012,0.0004888274,0.0006294079,0.0009870953,0.000321799,0.0007931152,0.0008159559,0.0006715226,0.002545772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003345898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006163336,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001567677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003401416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995047,0.00005915535,0.00002470006,0.0001292547,0.0002405657,0.00004167095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995295,0.0001278937,0.00003808946,0.00005504937,0.000219385,0.00003006557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003172996,0.00009878183,0.002176584,0.0002033136,0.0001210744,0.000145434,0.00007109284,0.003204227,0.2683826,0.001967529,0.004085648,0.7192265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001358268,0.0004296061,0.02492781,0.00009032418,0.0003761283,0.004409278,0.0000924324,0.6617436,0.2722742,0.004702461,0.03056043,0.0002579367],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01600682,0.0008709551,0.9786531,0.0001266255,0.0001639614,0.00008652583,0.000293275,0.001852098,0.001946592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1036892,0.000682988,0.8870878,0.0001636712,0.0001572239,0.0001408256,0.0005423679,0.0002930829,0.007242809],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003568889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01193911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05294579241227821,"score_gpt":0.3079724708167428,"score_spread":0.2550266784044646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}