{"id":"W2321521001","doi":"10.1061/41020(339)114","title":"Risk Assessment for Water Mains Using Fuzzy Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Construction Research Congress 2009","topic":"Water Systems and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mains electricity; Dam failure; Risk analysis (engineering); Pipeline transport; Risk assessment; Event (particle physics); Fuzzy logic; Forensic engineering; Reliability engineering; Failure rate; Risk management; Engineering; Failure mode and effects analysis; Computer science; Business; Environmental engineering; Artificial intelligence; Flood myth; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001298811,0.0006397534,0.0006187317,0.001705483,0.0005023997,0.00122321,0.0006723987,0.0007638613,0.001425912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002846312,0.0003248085,0.0009616246,0.0006153097,0.0004471716,0.00103029,0.000655388,0.000453964,0.00009968838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00152129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001170774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01051143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007190304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992336,0.0002301262,0.00003846954,0.00009869291,0.0003214767,0.00007761166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990804,0.0004732344,0.000134887,0.00003470181,0.000233334,0.00004337036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006007346,0.00003138274,0.002152763,0.00006244115,0.00006263379,0.0001237651,0.0001265481,0.9568802,0.002235065,0.0134763,0.0004066445,0.02438224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004647445,0.00003967169,0.0006322565,0.00001284263,0.00001458041,0.00002882736,0.00006494846,0.9890681,0.0004653747,0.009272322,0.0003820341,0.00001443541],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1151489,0.0002972042,0.8796362,0.0001968213,0.00001570302,0.0000854667,0.0001299777,0.00015769,0.004332027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.934893,0.0001791402,0.06347886,0.00001984531,0.00001348771,0.00005814377,0.00008082517,0.000009319814,0.001267419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01051143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02090049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04244021260309751,"score_gpt":0.3265345118749977,"score_spread":0.2840942992719002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}