{"id":"W2321521001","doi":"10.1061/41020(339)114","title":"Risk Assessment for Water Mains Using Fuzzy Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Construction Research Congress 2009","topic":"Water Systems and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mains electricity; Dam failure; Risk analysis (engineering); Pipeline transport; Risk assessment; Event (particle physics); Fuzzy logic; Forensic engineering; Reliability engineering; Failure rate; Risk management; Engineering; Failure mode and effects analysis; Computer science; Business; Environmental engineering; Artificial intelligence; Flood myth; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008419994,0.0001443222,0.0001877667,0.0002977693,0.0003268387,0.0002189533,0.0001456579,0.0001281406,0.00003503894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002971511,0.0001174604,0.00006332454,0.0002022892,0.00009603144,0.0002865889,0.0000212013,0.0002975407,0.00001112989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001882409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000397698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001740064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006432598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984479,0.0001278815,0.0002758115,0.0002531456,0.0003581615,0.0005370784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991562,0.00003510516,0.00002923717,0.00026108,0.0004004673,0.0001179474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000841639,0.0001360577,0.003580745,0.0003356043,0.0002152281,0.00001297727,0.0005179506,0.8824321,0.01342808,0.01434994,0.03244486,0.05246231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001268719,0.0001305392,0.001128696,0.00005879528,0.00002771352,0.0000679141,0.0003755212,0.9647784,0.01154257,0.004936901,0.01530565,0.0003785871],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2139178,0.0003287304,0.7310164,0.0002365602,0.002496874,0.002233756,0.0001265159,0.0005793677,0.04906405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9339668,0.00007190632,0.06451745,0.00001005553,0.0003919046,0.00006486454,0.00006290439,0.00003271175,0.0008814016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.720049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4789898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04244021260309751,"score_gpt":0.3265345118749977,"score_spread":0.2840942992719002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}