{"id":"W2322019043","doi":"10.2514/6.2005-6369","title":"Receding Horizons with Heading Constraints for Collision Avoidance","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit","topic":"Robotic Path Planning Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Collision avoidance; Heading (navigation); Model predictive control; Trajectory; Control theory (sociology); Computer science; Horizon; Control (management); Sample (material); Range (aeronautics); Collision; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Mathematics; Aerospace engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003871379,0.0006035923,0.0004829699,0.0002549872,0.0002991109,0.0005397538,0.0006599372,0.0003969525,0.003092991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002054817,0.0002078423,0.00031948,0.000300539,0.0003926509,0.0009445353,0.0004887378,0.001097584,0.0003719862],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004824872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007123689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00362357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003235799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996961,0.00007257132,0.00001084615,0.00005127359,0.0001390416,0.00003009818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995182,0.0002691735,0.00007525355,0.00004920126,0.00006801614,0.0000201839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001460003,0.00005201538,0.0002482566,0.0002768296,0.00003548287,0.0001831603,0.0001516503,0.7737774,0.008909916,0.09774692,0.002399317,0.116073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003298596,0.0001006778,0.0001505641,0.00002723763,0.00001438392,0.0000456326,0.00001841868,0.9607951,0.002665502,0.0288681,0.007263809,0.00001752486],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01506907,0.001402787,0.9746428,0.0001730035,0.00008607755,0.00003664004,0.00006960781,0.0003120528,0.008207975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8130338,0.00169376,0.1780896,0.0001297136,0.0001182271,0.0001340063,0.000181188,0.00007967487,0.006539988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00362357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01034713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01369144722465897,"score_gpt":0.2431916295927652,"score_spread":0.2295001823681062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}