{"id":"W2322815219","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2011.07.414","title":"494 Effect of ischemic postconditioning on infarct size evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging in patients treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; TIMI; Cardiology; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Myocardial infarction; Internal medicine; Conventional PCI; Ejection fraction; Clinical endpoint; Ischemic preconditioning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ischemia; Randomized controlled trial; Radiology; Heart failure","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005854554,0.0003653303,0.001322291,0.0002200893,0.0004214698,0.0006188898,0.000270241,0.0008143546,0.002076975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00244746,0.0002324584,0.001103245,0.0003067594,0.0005168173,0.0005043182,0.0003039467,0.001476609,0.0002633884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003936985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005434039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001843328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003486778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996521,0.0001166881,0.00002968399,0.00005594031,0.00005295176,0.00009268027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986933,0.0005738563,0.0001916839,0.00006425702,0.00005256699,0.0004243468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.2057476,0.006278226,0.7476316,0.00021577,0.00193359,0.00133835,0.000299224,0.0005234705,0.00631016,0.0002797871,0.0007683408,0.02867405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002265188,0.01434239,0.9808368,0.00002136944,0.0007135579,0.0002867689,0.0001238031,0.000571268,0.0002987162,0.0001668733,0.0003426291,0.0000307263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977487,0.0007009444,0.00005235189,0.0001423912,0.00005623677,0.00001501875,0.00008297658,0.000004672441,0.001196685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989828,0.0002823623,0.00005710458,0.00009265161,0.0001634956,0.00001384198,0.0001635134,0.00000232695,0.0002417671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002076975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006948173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004900671058680766,"score_gpt":0.2146829556995704,"score_spread":0.2097822846408896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}