{"id":"W2322903761","doi":"10.2166/wqrjc.2013.020","title":"Pollutant removal efficiency of a retrofitted stormwater detention pond","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Urban Stormwater Management Solutions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Stormwater; Pollutant; Environmental science; Surface runoff; Detention basin; Retention basin; Environmental engineering; Retrofitting; Total suspended solids; Suspended solids; First flush; Pollution; Hydrology (agriculture); Wastewater; Chemical oxygen demand; Engineering; Chemistry; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006403525,0.0001622489,0.0002348079,0.0002966461,0.0005911928,0.0002008608,0.0006859596,0.00008834009,0.0134813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001537432,0.0001053007,0.0001931818,0.000443811,0.0006472027,0.0008558852,0.0006760285,0.0006749727,0.003684083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005747112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002169657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001907003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005670121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947111,0.001135726,0.0007487317,0.0003444258,0.002001081,0.001058958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988781,0.00005673313,0.0001319152,0.0004797873,0.0001468887,0.0003066255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008897008,0.0003810088,0.05119602,0.00003563789,0.00007845886,0.0000566964,0.002365735,0.00007968518,0.9250062,0.0002237586,0.01736388,0.003124018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003038611,0.001201544,0.7776722,0.000120703,0.00006760721,0.0005643268,0.002143644,0.001597002,0.1452626,0.02681855,0.04050193,0.001011246],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888875,0.00002884077,0.001478218,0.00211928,0.0001705466,0.0004216583,0.00000557802,0.00002946149,0.006858903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887992,0.00001330396,0.001281533,0.00006015705,0.00008621902,0.00001777037,0.000005545025,0.00001946181,0.009716775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7797435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08443838980959853,"score_gpt":0.3512281595061137,"score_spread":0.2667897696965152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}