{"id":"W2322903761","doi":"10.2166/wqrjc.2013.020","title":"Pollutant removal efficiency of a retrofitted stormwater detention pond","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Urban Stormwater Management Solutions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Stormwater; Pollutant; Environmental science; Surface runoff; Detention basin; Retention basin; Environmental engineering; Retrofitting; Total suspended solids; Suspended solids; First flush; Pollution; Hydrology (agriculture); Wastewater; Chemical oxygen demand; Engineering; Chemistry; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002512234,0.0002939067,0.0004975195,0.0002413296,0.0002623526,0.0004987947,0.0004078405,0.0003892209,0.0009173528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004186556,0.0001344527,0.0003274122,0.000321527,0.000226549,0.0003199183,0.0003236746,0.0002928117,0.0003040742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000296548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002575679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001156591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001553768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997142,0.00003641238,0.00002507746,0.00006939698,0.000121072,0.00003384965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998565,0.00002546611,0.00002826767,0.00001965187,0.00004984635,0.00002027934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004122853,0.0002231057,0.0054257,0.0001572208,0.00002159382,0.0002042132,0.00006427798,0.005541616,0.9726675,0.00004763673,0.00009480699,0.01514006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004544239,0.001851778,0.02441621,0.00000914609,0.00005996857,0.0003498036,0.0001760133,0.0303893,0.9404656,0.00007147782,0.002136835,0.00002848685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970074,0.00004276949,0.002465276,0.00001372031,0.000008119935,0.00001793561,0.00006752538,0.00008453699,0.0002928911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964209,0.000058469,0.00217551,0.00001221188,0.000002750523,0.00001340341,0.000126291,0.00001212134,0.001178419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001156591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003068805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08443838980959853,"score_gpt":0.3512281595061137,"score_spread":0.2667897696965152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}