{"id":"W2323128254","doi":"10.1075/forum.7.2.05del","title":"Cinquante ans d’interprétation parlementaire","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FORUM Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Interpretation (philosophy); Interpreter; Constitutional interpretation; Democracy; Political science; Politics; Law; Commons; Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006186064,0.0002825356,0.0003300855,0.000927644,0.0001486566,0.000554335,0.0003700699,0.00008738148,0.0007087445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002791897,0.0002812402,0.0003487581,0.00009622975,0.0001288451,0.001712832,0.00001565577,0.0003238423,0.00001890504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002422817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000125353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001047001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004657927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973906,0.0001473494,0.001266225,0.0003093206,0.0006587656,0.0002277077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969404,0.0002246484,0.001010476,0.0001318598,0.001555736,0.000136849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001566793,0.0005916058,0.0020292,0.0000445535,0.0008950228,0.0000545023,0.07124182,0.003545993,0.002335703,0.6116365,0.001582683,0.3044757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01267612,0.00415336,0.02808088,0.003528702,0.001596593,0.002214769,0.05893599,0.297288,0.004536674,0.2499586,0.3342898,0.002740529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2881694,0.00134423,0.4977577,0.06624936,0.01282341,0.0008335439,0.0003158258,0.0002672278,0.1322393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923294,0.0005080792,0.00217936,0.002143975,0.001524388,0.00001095534,0.0002137194,0.00002828979,0.001061892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7041599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0260206462541133,"score_gpt":0.3107533095904185,"score_spread":0.2847326633363051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}