{"id":"W2323198552","doi":"10.2472/jsms.51.227","title":"Study of the Impact Energy-Absorption Property of Talc-Reinforced Polypropylene Copolymer. I. Practical Method of Impact Resistance Evaluation of Talc-Reinforced Polypropylene.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Society of Materials Science Japan","topic":"Polymer crystallization and properties","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hatch (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Polypropylene; Composite material; Talc; Ultimate tensile strength; Izod impact strength test; Tensile testing; Impact resistance; Stress (linguistics); RADIUS; Structural engineering; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000235893,0.0002405188,0.0001004749,0.0004059558,0.0001029422,0.0001087855,0.000122522,0.0001788232,0.0008409627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003216223,0.0000875247,0.0001381124,0.0002041541,0.0001508442,0.0002694936,0.0000893461,0.0002044576,0.0001833183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009636744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006880065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004041358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003153569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999887,0.00001486451,0.000004927246,0.00002015598,0.00005358065,0.00001945855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997695,0.0000757992,0.00006603441,0.0000155756,0.00005374512,0.00001930743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002177423,0.000009200851,0.0003022572,0.00003320807,0.000002756596,0.00003701731,0.0000183,0.0001441094,0.9974453,0.00003331614,0.000008044128,0.001944674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001680799,0.0002609784,0.004732737,0.000002964362,0.000007600732,0.00006792929,0.00001686706,0.001724277,0.9927981,0.000009748864,0.0003732404,0.000003939934],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.992554,0.0008970385,0.005238995,0.0000172427,0.000005376682,0.00002188624,0.00004641977,0.0000228379,0.001196236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996566,0.0003815738,0.002243917,0.000009969855,0.000004063342,0.00001044049,0.0000559268,0.0000073353,0.0007209064],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0008409627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00281328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05823912061438744,"score_gpt":0.3426092428732254,"score_spread":0.284370122258838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}