{"id":"W2323335983","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2014.03.1168","title":"A systematic review of methodological frameworks for evaluation of ethical considerations in health technology assessment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Value in Health","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Scope (computer science); Engineering ethics; Context (archaeology); Health technology; Management science; Identification (biology); Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Computer science; Political science; Health care; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1481815,0.002812841,0.01227368,0.02084735,0.002104448,0.007740701,0.004539483,0.00528295,0.005266075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4185694,0.001925055,0.01366188,0.01757814,0.004635626,0.006738773,0.00575374,0.006071016,0.0004016874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01338971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04491517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01026284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02919269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8066053,0.1034123,0.06127472,0.004618719,0.02297664,0.001112232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6276896,0.305812,0.03915152,0.006018273,0.01991554,0.001413053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003909467,0.00003408582,0.0006832574,0.8366027,0.01683948,0.00007673496,0.0005440005,0.0002718825,0.0001078979,0.003916479,0.003519787,0.1370127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004339786,0.000107939,0.000983092,0.9225658,0.04912703,0.0001449566,0.000271079,0.0001778645,0.000163723,0.004228839,0.02174055,0.00005520882],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004042907,0.9922224,0.002660234,0.001791594,0.000381127,0.00174242,0.0003242895,0.00001634331,0.0004573475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01590667,0.9536706,0.01965741,0.002979623,0.000345972,0.006870577,0.0003361719,0.000027866,0.0002051285],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8518185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7836681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8187216557482284,"score_gpt":0.6365590466668659,"score_spread":0.1821626090813625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}