{"id":"W2323374361","doi":"10.1061/40927(243)213","title":"Strategic Insights into the Jordan River Conflict","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of California, Davis; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Win-win game; Game theory; Politics; Conflict analysis; Social conflict; Management science; Resolution (logic); Value (mathematics); Operations research; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001134122,0.0001868023,0.0001773389,0.00014572,0.0005506213,0.0001929849,0.000564666,0.00004873838,0.00165677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006625903,0.00008950707,0.00006881866,0.0001393633,0.001231073,0.0001476053,0.0002709909,0.0001875065,0.001363117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002228641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001732376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005458936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001589793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981619,0.0001182156,0.0004086243,0.0004207445,0.0005602384,0.0003303172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989028,0.0003383677,0.00009061383,0.0004864545,0.000008243459,0.0001735169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001241653,0.00116987,0.2170424,0.00002953065,0.0003699063,0.0003679672,0.2479395,0.00056948,0.1327105,0.0837655,0.008410249,0.3063834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003249414,0.00003531186,0.03821985,0.00000573395,0.00001568558,0.0000119148,0.003658716,0.0000701335,0.01235783,0.05060724,0.8944877,0.0002049447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.978309,0.0007544501,0.00005548534,0.0004808898,0.0001353179,0.000188682,0.000003980562,0.00002180478,0.02005039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970712,0.00004671389,0.00004723724,0.0006533777,0.0001230786,0.00001051933,0.000007591368,0.00001163509,0.02838784],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8860775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03683656069350976,"score_gpt":0.2819840723467628,"score_spread":0.245147511653253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}