{"id":"W2323374361","doi":"10.1061/40927(243)213","title":"Strategic Insights into the Jordan River Conflict","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of California, Davis; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Win-win game; Game theory; Politics; Conflict analysis; Social conflict; Management science; Resolution (logic); Value (mathematics); Operations research; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009835473,0.0004126928,0.000263602,0.001587376,0.001883349,0.003526085,0.0006992552,0.001165042,0.008908301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001823794,0.0001982689,0.0002799955,0.001948387,0.003020657,0.00347697,0.002454793,0.00128177,0.0003677488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002424347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002432541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006452121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01303041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989752,0.000747373,0.00002008683,0.0000371071,0.0001104074,0.0001098613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994855,0.0002708064,0.00009427626,0.00001520654,0.00005720598,0.00007700668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002481208,0.00002756647,0.0008098029,0.00006486407,0.000007028808,0.0003860182,0.002704259,0.01359687,0.0001375453,0.9705212,0.002757068,0.008962923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030895,0.00004042562,0.0009357088,0.0000870718,0.00001031622,0.0002010839,0.0167023,0.03220674,0.0001522406,0.8766489,0.07296293,0.00002129761],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2867863,0.003511499,0.06147552,0.02701232,0.0002848564,0.0001226169,0.00026444,0.00007303542,0.6204695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726624,0.002399981,0.01164356,0.000704498,0.00005853126,0.00005406875,0.00008782696,0.000015567,0.01237354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008908301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02980125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03683656069350976,"score_gpt":0.2819840723467628,"score_spread":0.245147511653253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}