{"id":"W2323523704","doi":"10.1021/jp210454z","title":"Evaluation of the Cross Section of Elongated Micelles by Static and Dynamic Light Scattering","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","topic":"Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Micelle; Decane; Dynamic light scattering; Hydrodynamic radius; Degree of polymerization; Static light scattering; Scattering; Light scattering; Aggregation number; RADIUS; Materials science; Copolymer; Polymer chemistry; Chemistry; Polymerization; Physical chemistry; Physics; Critical micelle concentration; Organic chemistry; Polymer; Optics; Nanotechnology; Composite material; Aqueous solution; Nanoparticle","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003535544,0.00008000114,0.0001422422,0.000005215411,0.0000493812,0.000006827752,0.0001295292,0.00003527568,0.00005773333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006596524,0.00004730635,0.00006052781,0.00005655749,0.00008974603,0.0001229965,0.00002985258,0.000133681,1.880052e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004062132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002371302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002122697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.403269e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999193,0.00004592307,0.0002596579,0.00004392542,0.0003664091,0.00009104824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989859,0.00008838899,0.0005926634,0.000132489,0.0001684836,0.00003207176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003102792,0.00009425401,0.0004222764,0.0001129507,0.00004389036,1.802252e-8,0.000652173,0.0001288201,0.9965935,6.226322e-7,0.000009093226,0.001911362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002388417,0.000006827182,0.001709919,0.0001071205,0.0002003199,0.00001126161,0.0002190042,0.002765682,0.9946028,0.00006269475,0.00002760037,0.00004794478],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999121,0.0004434402,0.00007978779,0.00007532979,0.00003351589,0.00002208817,0.00001230388,0.0000023981,0.0002101075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997295,0.00002310709,0.000006237465,0.000003938769,0.0001542179,0.000001040063,0.000002830333,0.000009109006,0.00007000828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002636862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1929097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008799787986864914,"score_gpt":0.2694772953437897,"score_spread":0.2606775073569248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}