{"id":"W2324129387","doi":"10.1002/j.1538-9235.2001.tb03518.x","title":"INTER-OBSERVER DIFFERENCES IN MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF CORNEAL ENDOTHELIUM OF NORMAL SUBJECTS WITH THE CONTOUR METHOD.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Optometry and Vision Science","topic":"Retinal and Optic Conditions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Association for Canadian Studies; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corneal endothelium; Observer (physics); Ophthalmology; Medicine; Mathematics; Cornea; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009033227,0.00006498968,0.0002888352,0.0004454987,0.00006054456,0.00001486154,0.0001501758,0.00002620022,0.0001914326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001592723,0.00003036033,0.00004972877,0.003271886,0.0007074156,0.00009989156,0.00006509345,0.00009725623,6.482235e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007755207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003358133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007681031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001843718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991204,0.00005160673,0.0001843736,0.0001915408,0.0003189798,0.0001331511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991932,0.0003630009,0.0000937369,0.0001594469,0.0001228991,0.00006774648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002343016,0.0001125433,0.9606087,0.0000117357,0.00003393157,0.00002337612,0.0002139637,0.000007438551,0.0345855,0.0001223469,0.000005901242,0.00404025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003977109,0.0005690089,0.9891719,0.00004765971,0.0001268913,0.00004900838,0.0006230239,0.004224832,0.004731236,0.000007563283,0.00001129212,0.00003991431],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991977,0.00004722838,0.006407409,0.0003095322,0.00001591101,0.00008040103,0.000005919197,0.000003313667,0.001153288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974558,0.00003519162,0.002229656,0.00008005666,0.00000634343,0.000002535737,0.000001225455,0.000001202385,0.0001880369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02985426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2606502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03059209955892579,"score_gpt":0.4039447864990152,"score_spread":0.3733526869400894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}