{"id":"W2324285607","doi":"10.1186/s12939-016-0349-1","title":"The utility of resilience as a conceptual framework for understanding and measuring LGBTQ health","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Equity in Health","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":185,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Capital Health","keywords":"Transgender; Psychological resilience; Normative; Health equity; Conceptual framework; Queer; Lesbian; Sociology; Resilience (materials science); Psychology; Public health; Social psychology; Political science; Gender studies; Medicine; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00471112,0.0001131707,0.0002565401,0.0001553059,0.0005666552,0.00006876406,0.0004732359,0.00009061384,0.00005240242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001647586,0.00007682905,0.00009724382,0.00008306265,0.0003122995,0.0001550721,0.00008661288,0.0002825467,0.000003030694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009261523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008312136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002544529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001704847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975397,0.0002983875,0.000910371,0.0002299221,0.0004388787,0.0005827698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959687,0.002663464,0.0007058061,0.0001713981,0.0002365694,0.0002540704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009518577,0.0001057835,0.03277647,0.0002947159,0.00006493025,0.000002202551,0.003699352,0.000001922455,0.000007934546,0.8726703,0.008025166,0.0813994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002159459,0.0008388947,0.03863881,0.0005465359,0.000005809306,0.0001295443,0.002802354,0.0000768608,0.000006263407,0.9463924,0.008281549,0.0001215502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1591488,0.007305039,0.4271604,0.3886435,0.01291696,0.002041032,0.0003594428,0.00004105891,0.00238375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936173,0.002615961,0.0008175928,0.001914973,0.0006570787,0.00003139464,0.000001607565,0.00001384757,0.0003302435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8344685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4358311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3712944903464863,"score_gpt":0.5594662979508229,"score_spread":0.1881718076043366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}