{"id":"W2324338342","doi":"10.5751/es-04827-170309","title":"Avoiding Environmental Catastrophes: Varieties of Principled Precaution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"South Carolina Water Resources Center, Clemson University; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Clemson University; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Economics; Positive economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000769629,0.00003601626,0.00006308252,0.00000712997,0.0005205526,0.000005334898,0.00003803108,0.00007513095,0.0004650682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002034851,0.00003553021,0.00003922716,0.00002308401,0.0003265564,0.0001176507,0.0000393732,0.00007710245,0.00001517112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005313976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001224742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005714308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004107388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994977,0.0001438207,0.00007449059,0.0000630111,0.00006825644,0.000152753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998282,0.00004590092,0.00003989987,0.0000374444,0.000003654689,0.00004492996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000106766,0.0002662364,0.3876429,0.00002532925,0.00008418304,1.989203e-7,0.46574,0.00001044213,0.001562734,0.1350799,0.00606133,0.003516088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001770027,0.00002637282,0.8474787,0.000001631234,0.00002054071,3.750143e-7,0.07080603,0.00002646448,0.00006929936,0.0003771314,0.08095338,0.00006310179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993958,0.0001096577,0.0002828736,0.0002097818,0.0001966334,0.0001049903,0.000002606875,0.00001651456,0.005118966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966983,0.001120131,0.0004555947,0.0001179321,0.00008290881,0.000008309647,0.000004954604,0.000001937191,0.001509924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4598357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5092171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01655134920310052,"score_gpt":0.2703008657027326,"score_spread":0.2537495164996321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}