{"id":"W2324381903","doi":"10.1177/154193120304701305","title":"Detection of Changes in Tactical Displays: A Comparison of Two Symbol Sets","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Symbol (formal); Heading (navigation); Computer science; Navy; Float (project management); Factor (programming language); Flicker; Human–computer interaction; Operator (biology); Artificial intelligence; Multimedia; Computer graphics (images); Engineering; Programming language; Systems engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002221347,0.0005876505,0.0005997819,0.001343155,0.0002381953,0.00126789,0.0005129141,0.0008336838,0.002183914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03162707,0.0003301745,0.0003757139,0.0004759516,0.0005247606,0.001999691,0.001445775,0.0005126924,0.0004073397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003458938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002464066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004375945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004268971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976497,0.0007921325,0.0002860573,0.0002593171,0.0008735291,0.0001392812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750195,0.01939926,0.001769124,0.001014906,0.001925126,0.0008720788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03686494,0.001686539,0.05937896,0.002614187,0.000685546,0.0003678871,0.003434872,0.01160091,0.4556231,0.002932257,0.001447446,0.4233633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002690563,0.0513485,0.6426002,0.000475491,0.001139827,0.002084572,0.00363611,0.09740469,0.183938,0.00618894,0.007942639,0.0005504604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838988,0.0003407187,0.01207992,0.00004945891,0.00006234804,0.0001608705,0.0001284171,0.000149813,0.003129661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796928,0.0002779351,0.01859295,0.00008799698,0.00003069073,0.0002298815,0.0004143877,0.00006643108,0.0006069244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002221347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01174772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03271824520105288,"score_gpt":0.3390768321589107,"score_spread":0.3063585869578578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}