{"id":"W2324504247","doi":"10.1139/f2011-095","title":"The relative role of environmental, spatial, and land-use patterns in explaining aquatic macrophyte community composition","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Macrophyte; Spatial variability; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Environmental science; Aquatic plant; Land use; Spatial ecology; Aquatic ecosystem; Relative species abundance; Community structure; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001677903,0.0003914722,0.00031868,0.001017219,0.000629329,0.000968428,0.0002700113,0.000260822,0.0007306663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00375677,0.0003560338,0.0005758491,0.0009756557,0.0006344752,0.0007046665,0.0007637467,0.0002093333,0.0001469502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005279321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005122103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04678785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1638647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993398,0.000316044,0.00006089482,0.0001206471,0.00006776453,0.00009482243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980253,0.001130294,0.0003815852,0.0001776178,0.0001588543,0.0001264695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003997235,0.00001074562,0.9930725,0.00001702021,0.0001431834,0.000032444,0.0001830679,0.0009058291,0.001824187,0.00005018468,0.00001926931,0.003701703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002077711,0.00002243231,0.9956248,0.000004963007,0.00004349462,0.00003688022,0.0002357036,0.003620308,0.0001913149,0.0001091343,0.0001039691,0.000004893579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989962,0.0001332894,0.0006128209,0.00001289062,7.399063e-7,0.000004831822,0.00008570623,0.000004231401,0.000149272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933,0.00005465003,0.0004487844,0.000002857297,0.000001209163,0.000004196504,0.00008656334,0.000002672415,0.00006914304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04678785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09303105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01881642976529454,"score_gpt":0.1922191533033619,"score_spread":0.1734027235380673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}