{"id":"W2324712650","doi":"10.1524/stuf.2010.0025","title":"How to disambiguate an evidential construct? Taxonomy and compositionality of Romanian verbal complexes with evidential semantics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Typology and Universals","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Evidentiality; Principle of compositionality; Linguistics; Romanian; Computer science; Semantics (computer science); Taxonomy (biology); Morpheme; Construct (python library); Natural language processing; Counterfactual conditional; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003324985,0.000325322,0.0005077738,0.002732365,0.001878227,0.004621334,0.0009534209,0.0007031876,0.004208938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00624191,0.0003326912,0.0006154249,0.002392197,0.005587686,0.008931951,0.002966008,0.001184615,0.0005379735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001085644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005910255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007379988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970424,0.001325139,0.000414505,0.000530989,0.0004993864,0.0001876062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967749,0.0013664,0.0004273642,0.0008708632,0.0004641995,0.00009618561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003263702,0.00001287582,0.001798279,0.00006786433,0.00001265934,0.0001404167,0.004573057,0.0004967208,0.001663402,0.9707444,0.0002257405,0.02023197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000224055,0.00007582836,0.004556393,0.0001954264,0.00006369186,0.001234696,0.009423969,0.01313622,0.006609056,0.9033657,0.06125297,0.00006369976],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5319858,0.001261122,0.3678092,0.001050964,0.0001034746,0.0001131575,0.0003416709,0.0003915054,0.09694315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697667,0.000126323,0.02831937,0.00003861145,0.00002208907,0.00002473993,0.00012904,0.00005063409,0.001522537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004621334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01758444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02038804103959265,"score_gpt":0.2391850845096706,"score_spread":0.218797043470078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}