{"id":"W2324851963","doi":"10.1109/ecce.2014.6953973","title":"Design considerations of 2-D magnetizers for high flux density measurements","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Non-Destructive Testing Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Magnetization; Yoke (aeronautics); Flux (metallurgy); Variation (astronomy); Magnetic flux; Materials science; Sample (material); Field (mathematics); Core (optical fiber); Magnetic field; Condensed matter physics; Physics; Mathematics; Composite material; Mechanics; Thermodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002850375,0.0000835617,0.0001223067,0.00004619497,0.00003541925,0.00001000787,0.00005229255,0.00003992765,0.00006984019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003226085,0.00008527272,0.00002185679,0.00004268095,0.00003130848,0.0000483362,0.00001008555,0.00003624039,0.000004541264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003158616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001164908,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002818746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001235997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995339,0.00002801326,0.0001473944,0.00008997924,0.00008749917,0.000113236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993796,0.0002698023,0.00002253046,0.0001601283,0.0001394073,0.00002854144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009568942,0.00002320556,0.002737438,0.00009889869,0.00005505225,3.096504e-7,0.00006663898,0.001039068,0.8646254,0.1134804,0.01712428,0.0007397156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002322659,0.00008417729,0.002984969,0.00001337929,0.00001835123,0.000002509424,0.000002801914,0.002347662,0.6077815,0.3864128,0.000008569069,0.0001110293],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06981463,0.000005285966,0.9211039,0.00002724324,0.00007901446,0.000323456,0.000001981835,0.0006535427,0.007990973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5013362,1.830229e-7,0.4986011,0.00001502658,0.00000885357,0.00001785449,0.000001224851,0.00001024733,0.000009256882],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4315216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3477321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05948129317882065,"score_gpt":0.2477862487600133,"score_spread":0.1883049555811927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}