{"id":"W2325076983","doi":"10.4310/sii.2010.v3.n4.a4","title":"Empirical likelihood confidence intervals for ratio of hazard rates under right censorship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics and Its Interface","topic":"Data-Driven Disease Surveillance","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Confidence interval; Statistics; Hazard ratio; Censorship; Empirical likelihood; Mathematics; Econometrics; Likelihood-ratio test; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07136309,0.001732542,0.003234491,0.00590042,0.0006606555,0.005754348,0.005983202,0.00417988,0.008491897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4882176,0.001125992,0.002322973,0.004447753,0.004855977,0.008510225,0.004064337,0.006021632,0.00147146],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001887784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001505771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001771551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006743586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9640713,0.02458903,0.001978892,0.003116962,0.005452371,0.0007914321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.375147,0.5783431,0.01441605,0.01970793,0.01087629,0.001509684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007143872,0.0001517866,0.01064063,0.001017301,0.0006230306,0.0005354662,0.0009257381,0.2102361,0.0009388919,0.6651361,0.005943044,0.1031376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001470224,0.0001906859,0.003991837,0.0006116125,0.0001769398,0.0006683348,0.0002230957,0.6043338,0.00142681,0.3839932,0.004088398,0.0001481893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01216742,0.002315674,0.9805833,0.0007945565,0.0001139039,0.00009322408,0.0004151094,0.0007328825,0.002783926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6155828,0.003955556,0.3709534,0.0009665777,0.001027042,0.001113221,0.002519443,0.0008219087,0.00306],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07136309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3774086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03331059000405925,"score_gpt":0.3690655084089494,"score_spread":0.3357549184048901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}