{"id":"W2325146463","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2016.155","title":"Status and trends of water quality in the Tafna catchment: a comparative study using water quality indices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agência Nacional de Águas","keywords":"Water quality; Environmental science; Sampling (signal processing); Wadi; Pollution; Drainage basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Quality (philosophy); Water resource management; Sample (material); Index (typography); Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Computer science; Engineering; Biology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00341926,0.000117733,0.0002688615,0.0001230178,0.00009774544,0.00005142815,0.0001560008,0.00004488916,0.0001163267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001208794,0.00004259379,0.00004094308,0.00006667023,0.000147042,0.0005792063,0.0001432827,0.0001003313,0.000004812414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004980049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001216996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000314249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99746,0.000990756,0.0007256507,0.0001480838,0.000453955,0.0002215626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994453,0.00006616564,0.0002230914,0.0001714674,0.00003195077,0.00006201596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003735031,0.0008581118,0.4588474,0.00003192418,0.00007392214,0.000008935238,0.2937514,0.00009567842,0.243538,0.00007504255,0.00003923231,0.002306856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002478587,0.0005255089,0.8037518,0.00003959197,0.00005358773,0.00001439452,0.005944564,0.00002422202,0.1842155,0.00202479,0.0007605351,0.0001669571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978084,0.00001797224,0.0001245772,0.001786246,0.00005209664,0.0001296769,0.000007365277,0.000002648509,0.00007102542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996502,0.00002213681,0.0001452904,0.0000751465,0.00002461712,0.000002858313,0.000003426066,0.000003702547,0.00007259465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3449044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1839743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09915280062046294,"score_gpt":0.3877888774321319,"score_spread":0.2886360768116689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}