{"id":"W2325146463","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2016.155","title":"Status and trends of water quality in the Tafna catchment: a comparative study using water quality indices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agência Nacional de Águas","keywords":"Water quality; Environmental science; Sampling (signal processing); Wadi; Pollution; Drainage basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Quality (philosophy); Water resource management; Sample (material); Index (typography); Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Computer science; Engineering; Biology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004581657,0.0001517575,0.0003290646,0.001785089,0.0006166517,0.0006800684,0.0002974839,0.0003889822,0.0005167915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009751535,0.0001658916,0.000299104,0.00261835,0.0005640317,0.000490616,0.0004105114,0.0002036237,0.00008795291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002612491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001248373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3940141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5379182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997191,0.00003752541,0.00002573825,0.00006096647,0.00006870856,0.00008794313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994542,0.00009523206,0.0001500089,0.00002684105,0.0001833277,0.00009040507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000193667,0.00006120218,0.9819747,0.00004790519,0.00007559709,0.0003693159,0.002600822,0.0001971622,0.001979687,0.0001066096,0.0001928623,0.0122004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001540055,0.00002524047,0.9987764,0.000003292363,0.000006669378,0.00005625332,0.0007387273,0.0001427663,0.00003649382,0.000005416367,0.0002046327,0.000002674661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993898,0.00006017416,0.000038612,0.00001374808,0.000001039128,0.000005575673,0.0001514359,0.000001866491,0.0003377007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990834,0.00008558293,0.0001406594,0.000008420199,0.000001888686,0.00001121614,0.0004089424,0.000001241533,0.0002586016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3940141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7834414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09915280062046294,"score_gpt":0.3877888774321319,"score_spread":0.2886360768116689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}