{"id":"W2325744540","doi":"10.1111/caje.12166","title":"Rogue aid? An empirical analysis of China's aid allocation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":303,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Endowment; Politics; Economics; Development aid; Factor endowment; Test (biology); Food aid; Public economics; Developing country; Political science; Food security; Economic growth; Geography; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002469893,0.0002688889,0.0004059194,0.003584169,0.001048258,0.001291471,0.0005279976,0.0003664337,0.00355011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006072714,0.0001335991,0.0002665351,0.006170673,0.001534666,0.0008668933,0.001549899,0.0005175511,0.0002754894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002204704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001866878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05343418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05489824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983947,0.0005482828,0.0001002292,0.0002251866,0.0002876425,0.0004439224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916254,0.002209661,0.003236186,0.0004964111,0.001172767,0.001259661],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001118858,0.00007138697,0.9821602,0.00003195886,0.00008600778,0.000175949,0.002801988,0.002022424,0.0003077403,0.002874407,0.0008502344,0.008505625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001417474,0.0000614267,0.9880351,0.00002420293,0.00003909873,0.00005375963,0.004324124,0.004454727,0.0002608622,0.0005295237,0.00218377,0.00001910001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984699,0.00008405135,0.00008128641,0.00009056711,0.0000025603,0.000007044295,0.0001388085,0.000002726231,0.001123067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994341,0.0000325165,0.00003217601,0.00001711477,0.000003036378,0.000006233643,0.0001241801,0.000001102772,0.0003496238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05343418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1062464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1792342186628098,"score_gpt":0.2590083742635566,"score_spread":0.07977415560074677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}