{"id":"W2325970733","doi":"10.1111/jofi.12069","title":"Optimal CEO Compensation with Search: Theory and Empirical Evidence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Finance","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Executive compensation; Principal–agent problem; Microeconomics; Systematic risk; Economics; Externality; Compensation (psychology); Agency (philosophy); Empirical evidence; Sensitivity (control systems); Shock (circulatory); Agency cost; Econometrics; Business; Finance; Incentive","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009649736,0.00009042726,0.0001407608,0.00004424374,0.000120772,0.0001031541,0.0002307409,0.00002228134,0.00004990898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001000973,0.00005037375,0.00002473016,0.0002310162,0.0001281423,0.001641038,0.00005202616,0.0001892279,0.00007296441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001343809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003732003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009688429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001247797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993083,0.0000314512,0.0001955833,0.00007697051,0.0002426746,0.0001449603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989828,0.0001918751,0.0004093101,0.0001333203,0.0002755502,0.000007142351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005219001,0.0003334771,0.738831,0.0004559038,0.0001353582,0.0001824488,0.002779316,0.02324723,0.004774757,0.04733419,0.08201808,0.09468918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003875433,0.00007378328,0.9886326,0.0003392834,0.00003447731,0.00006551873,0.0001658794,0.001467241,0.0000896153,0.002024477,0.006609347,0.0001102907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903067,0.0007361555,0.004261355,0.004275613,0.00006136165,0.0001081019,3.587568e-7,0.000006207222,0.0002441043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975002,0.0003449921,0.0003607405,0.00118222,0.0003337756,0.000001745047,1.435395e-7,0.000008254896,0.0002679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2498015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2054182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06517917822168118,"score_gpt":0.2597703562328126,"score_spread":0.1945911780111314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}