{"id":"W2325970733","doi":"10.1111/jofi.12069","title":"Optimal CEO Compensation with Search: Theory and Empirical Evidence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Finance","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Executive compensation; Principal–agent problem; Microeconomics; Systematic risk; Economics; Externality; Compensation (psychology); Agency (philosophy); Empirical evidence; Sensitivity (control systems); Shock (circulatory); Agency cost; Econometrics; Business; Finance; Incentive","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002951631,0.0004342493,0.001286536,0.0008352355,0.0003691722,0.00225185,0.0007453788,0.002171203,0.004611951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01901441,0.0004038727,0.0005268194,0.0008866742,0.001856996,0.002042528,0.0007313706,0.0009758068,0.0003551837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001320836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001267625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001847009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001169901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998634,0.0007439055,0.0000718552,0.0001220802,0.0002015436,0.0002264443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805613,0.01475596,0.002786525,0.0005956963,0.0006764169,0.0006240531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002069655,0.00150719,0.0746456,0.001385643,0.0004289527,0.0007727601,0.0005115712,0.3963555,0.002744447,0.4262273,0.005517748,0.08783351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007561604,0.0006466802,0.0428795,0.0002147363,0.0001875059,0.0003741822,0.0006013945,0.4657269,0.001529109,0.4844913,0.002500934,0.00009152134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.914675,0.01140214,0.03875699,0.004266503,0.00005393165,0.00006561469,0.0001267114,0.0000836982,0.03056933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974596,0.0006701267,0.0008447146,0.00008216035,0.00003420253,0.000008180933,0.00002130379,0.000004527913,0.0008752069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004611951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01560992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06517917822168118,"score_gpt":0.2597703562328126,"score_spread":0.1945911780111314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}