{"id":"W2326081763","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2016.04.001","title":"The win ratio approach to analyzing composite outcomes: An application to the EVOLVE trial","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Clinical Trials","topic":"Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"St. John’s Health Sciences Centre","funders":"Amgen","keywords":"Medicine; Hazard ratio; Clinical endpoint; Placebo; Myocardial infarction; Confidence interval; Randomization; Randomized controlled trial; Internal medicine; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0930682,0.001644917,0.00350567,0.002911345,0.0007193811,0.003105997,0.00209194,0.001836931,0.008478618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2842554,0.0005706672,0.002641486,0.003416073,0.002425908,0.003859352,0.00350617,0.005066837,0.0009595626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001177751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003393876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001420994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00112025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9046997,0.08623665,0.001818262,0.001827164,0.004956026,0.0004622095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8143108,0.1693422,0.004954584,0.0066007,0.003609563,0.001182055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006140638,0.0003940339,0.007636268,0.001455316,0.002495177,0.0005640358,0.0007634247,0.02650846,0.0007252009,0.3566095,0.01704955,0.5796583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003583742,0.002504552,0.003711206,0.00036585,0.001189747,0.001433457,0.0002468583,0.2831633,0.001177986,0.6821496,0.02033712,0.0001364647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008989785,0.00235368,0.9814361,0.002563552,0.0004811353,0.0007895913,0.0002282908,0.0003936056,0.002764299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1974834,0.003290512,0.7889171,0.001619528,0.001062424,0.003361904,0.0002812939,0.0006138267,0.003369926],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4921976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8144677085776505,"score_gpt":0.6428355406033506,"score_spread":0.1716321679742999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}