{"id":"W2326864401","doi":"10.1139/l11-015","title":"Commuting mode choice in the context of travel demand management (TDM) policies: an empirical investigation in Edmonton, Alberta","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Carpool; Mode choice; Transport engineering; Demand management; Context (archaeology); Public transport; Nested logit; Travel behavior; Sustainability; Business; Operations research; Engineering; Economics; Econometrics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009214367,0.0002492033,0.000361132,0.0008811586,0.002284196,0.001544434,0.001407053,0.0005038386,0.001819015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001982116,0.0003232401,0.0002894014,0.002368587,0.001240132,0.0004890868,0.001102562,0.0008376917,0.0001842392],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01587939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01329759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9790754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993686,0.0001500565,0.00002072576,0.00006332206,0.0001522646,0.0002450804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987074,0.0004845124,0.0001848491,0.00005869283,0.0002995212,0.0002649115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003183738,0.0007220763,0.9523854,0.00007588459,0.00007540384,0.00148963,0.0212845,0.002052693,0.001115834,0.001710005,0.001543038,0.01722703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001174337,0.00006541145,0.9595388,0.00003066802,0.00001972594,0.00005404528,0.03675418,0.001793194,0.0001147187,0.00007447402,0.001524966,0.00001799433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987695,0.00005084094,0.00004879348,0.00006390215,0.000001138103,0.00001496914,0.00009912207,0.00000182025,0.0009498927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960278,0.000197767,0.0002164977,0.00007186354,0.000001861039,0.00002159095,0.000305907,0.000002219446,0.003154485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02092463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1152136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04000415911881576,"score_gpt":0.2777738226775854,"score_spread":0.2377696635587696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}