{"id":"W2327246359","doi":"10.14214/sf.82","title":"Dynamic old-growth forests? A case study of boreal black spruce forest bryophytes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Silva Fennica","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Chronosequence; Bryophyte; Taiga; Understory; Ecology; Old-growth forest; Boreal; Geography; Black spruce; Secondary forest; Forest ecology; Ecological succession; Ecosystem; Forestry; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology; Canopy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006996288,0.0003373843,0.0001958511,0.0005698957,0.004494213,0.001041111,0.0008199208,0.0007187391,0.0008384598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007430894,0.0001638273,0.000223308,0.001084675,0.001137178,0.0005439706,0.0006028262,0.0004838551,0.00008718799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006976717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002419099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6776728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9241748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996947,0.00007935091,0.000009979318,0.00004151979,0.00004871309,0.0001256806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994369,0.000129198,0.00009353733,0.00003459935,0.0001085858,0.0001971852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003296927,0.0008376096,0.7172109,0.0002304703,0.00006744984,0.1366012,0.07975392,0.002137532,0.009905322,0.002899322,0.002430041,0.04759662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002596728,0.0002400888,0.8526688,0.0001403738,0.00004946099,0.01979648,0.1014624,0.001940793,0.001488537,0.000649426,0.02148386,0.00005384662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974572,0.0003422163,0.0001810545,0.0001950157,0.000004485833,0.00002268479,0.0001110245,0.000004367991,0.00168187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970666,0.0003803103,0.0008505618,0.00008769265,0.000007036153,0.00001114397,0.00007904779,0.000003888646,0.001513751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6776728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6484509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02716712529031995,"score_gpt":0.2178404840605021,"score_spread":0.1906733587701822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}