{"id":"W2327246359","doi":"10.14214/sf.82","title":"Dynamic old-growth forests? A case study of boreal black spruce forest bryophytes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Silva Fennica","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Chronosequence; Bryophyte; Taiga; Understory; Ecology; Old-growth forest; Boreal; Geography; Black spruce; Secondary forest; Forest ecology; Ecological succession; Ecosystem; Forestry; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology; Canopy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001460031,0.000179233,0.0002829428,0.00002062435,0.0003121547,0.00001150104,0.0003254824,0.0001185456,0.0001614636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007524529,0.00007273148,0.0001150464,0.0002765783,0.0003347692,0.0001030811,0.0002607609,0.0001321342,0.00006445812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001890599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006711991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009650402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1212278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988818,0.00006909761,0.0002482425,0.0003359599,0.0001420274,0.0003229273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993713,0.000153695,0.0001401222,0.0001010495,0.0001480011,0.00008582449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001129766,0.00104465,0.9940129,0.00001235274,0.00009198605,0.0007002227,0.001982549,0.00000102556,0.0001832524,0.0002197589,0.0009457957,0.0006925547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003772021,0.002345815,0.9851798,0.000007552576,0.00006381885,0.00009396562,0.01086335,0.00003782129,0.00006997641,0.0007119185,0.00007274871,0.0001760354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973536,0.00005706681,3.767818e-7,0.0001663334,0.0001218305,0.0003873454,0.00004766121,0.00005838672,0.001807405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995189,0.00002797839,0.00009295843,0.00008442661,0.0000329498,0.00001179409,0.00001230382,0.000001008293,0.0002176672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1115774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02716712529031995,"score_gpt":0.2178404840605021,"score_spread":0.1906733587701822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}