{"id":"W2328022198","doi":"10.5860/choice.41-5296","title":"Wildlife, conservation, and human welfare: a United States and Canadian perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Perspective (graphical); Wildlife conservation; Welfare; Wildlife management; Environmental ethics; Geography; Political science; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Economics; Biology; Law; Philosophy; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002046211,0.0001495015,0.0001786063,0.00004393173,0.0003323323,0.00002422377,0.00009382473,0.00006799093,0.0001933315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001032419,0.0001316801,0.00002383163,0.0002154012,0.000410913,0.0001738769,0.00007269965,0.0002031327,0.00004539898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003200614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001094122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3159007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3596154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99916,0.0000513039,0.0002008479,0.0002845105,0.0001085724,0.0001947922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994586,0.00002811465,0.00006786549,0.0001712371,0.000007057786,0.0002671946],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003701592,0.001464274,0.8288919,0.0008259658,0.000178944,0.0001116086,0.01404067,0.001710736,0.003824206,0.1210241,0.01347901,0.01441164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004876654,0.00008654263,0.2411337,0.0001214702,0.00003459208,0.00001570476,0.0003704886,0.00003051612,0.00001468716,0.01458172,0.7428664,0.0002564663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9163184,0.004262809,0.00001119236,0.07704027,0.0000273645,0.0004808084,0.00009053186,0.00002434341,0.001744288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9270197,0.03279649,0.002034897,0.037172,0.0001362926,0.00003093643,0.0005058917,0.00003697504,0.0002667932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7293874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6886547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03005409989331471,"score_gpt":0.2897633666475137,"score_spread":0.259709266754199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}