{"id":"W2328304757","doi":"10.1139/t2012-051","title":"New ultimate pile capacity prediction method based on cone penetration test (CPT)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Florida; Florida Department of Transportation","keywords":"Cone penetration test; Pile; Geotechnical engineering; Penetration test; Engineering; Penetration (warfare); Structural engineering; Load testing; Cementation (geology); Materials science; Subgrade; Composite material; Operations research","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007370949,0.0002404416,0.0002345436,0.0002930354,0.0001660585,0.00008064007,0.0002262359,0.0003875901,0.0002498099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004025559,0.0002439161,0.0001199928,0.0002920417,0.00001662906,0.0002002386,0.000008374631,0.001221068,0.00009188674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006462508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000198446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001654995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004621022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983695,0.00004146161,0.0003788442,0.0001541322,0.0002969839,0.0007591016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976922,0.0001540916,0.0000449451,0.000289502,0.0000579634,0.001761349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004268545,0.00002483006,0.00005930217,0.00001646851,0.00001456146,0.00001078102,0.00001919094,0.9775739,0.001866448,0.0004694971,0.007601257,0.01233944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003814816,0.0001430114,0.003267496,0.00006764165,0.00003168457,0.0001916349,0.000006328892,0.9678327,0.00169314,0.0002451406,0.02586638,0.0002733891],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008937066,0.0001529057,0.9864699,0.0005174288,0.001409616,0.0002158216,0.00008819821,0.0007179357,0.001491148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827697,0.00002620467,0.01613389,0.0002557405,0.0006737795,0.0000101205,0.00001626751,0.00005672655,0.00005751476],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01420647463561669,"score_gpt":0.2083093220754004,"score_spread":0.1941028474397837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}