{"id":"W2329009225","doi":"10.1139/cjm-2014-0235","title":"Is root DNA a reliable proxy to assess arbuscular mycorrhizal community structure?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Microbiology","topic":"Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Korea Institute of Energy Research","keywords":"Community structure; Biology; Plant community; Biomass (ecology); Abundance (ecology); Ecosystem; Glomeromycota; Mycorrhizal fungi; Nutrient; Ecology; Biodiversity; Botany; Arbuscular mycorrhizal; Species richness; Horticulture; Symbiosis; Inoculation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002823247,0.000466572,0.0008292086,0.001279178,0.0002919187,0.001278183,0.0008658775,0.001480128,0.0009475115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01298382,0.0003632106,0.000315764,0.001241133,0.000794888,0.001496874,0.0007583863,0.0008837332,0.001188864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003108371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003160007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001261073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001971404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997525,0.0008369986,0.0001508387,0.0008911563,0.0004275185,0.0001684773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909776,0.003751239,0.002581018,0.001222959,0.001146409,0.0003207352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004749509,0.00009008616,0.6333007,0.001046717,0.0004129059,0.0002422559,0.0006581049,0.005778458,0.2590414,0.003146596,0.001226436,0.09458145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007581358,0.0007697428,0.7605358,0.0006015016,0.0005265542,0.001775952,0.001457114,0.0816313,0.1112749,0.01847371,0.02263503,0.0002426358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9028746,0.01045585,0.07799991,0.001294767,0.0001649007,0.00003762607,0.003214515,0.000341856,0.003615969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732891,0.001526143,0.02310043,0.0003004472,0.0000833615,0.00004682958,0.001127147,0.00006005518,0.0004666783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002823247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01493096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01636901398291814,"score_gpt":0.2128725304555582,"score_spread":0.1965035164726401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}