{"id":"W2329352703","doi":"10.1155/2001/183583","title":"The Case against Land Application of Sewage Sludge Pathogens","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology","topic":"Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sewage; Agriculture; Sewage farm; Sewage sludge; Tragedy (event); Public health; Environmental planning; Population; Water supply; Sewage sludge treatment; Business; Environmental protection; Sewage treatment; Environmental engineering; Waste management; Environmental health; Environmental science; Engineering; Ecology; Biology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000280135,0.0001091102,0.0002420957,0.000133216,0.0003799157,0.00001204053,0.0001085335,0.0002205256,0.0001376138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007825947,0.00007372349,0.00009840031,0.0001152838,0.0006931454,0.00002925514,0.00001699302,0.0002501375,0.00001634587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004964343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006127149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003247364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02067706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990466,0.0001578845,0.0003788077,0.0001080774,0.00001523325,0.0002934427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987046,0.0005081419,0.0002064114,0.0001275714,0.0001881306,0.0002651661],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009907442,0.0002251303,0.8256255,0.00003988543,0.0005399552,0.004480773,0.0002249707,0.00002851098,0.02374455,0.003269023,0.00791506,0.1338076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005546252,0.001359003,0.09238808,0.0001621596,0.000586198,0.2601305,0.0007548954,0.00003543432,0.001023606,0.001368243,0.6361251,0.0005204834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880135,0.009315986,0.0006913851,0.0003964957,0.0008478536,0.0001054316,0.0001620262,0.00000674095,0.0004605595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980109,0.001458646,0.00000403111,0.0003532317,0.00009337834,0.000004954859,0.00003040606,0.000007064699,0.00003739366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7332374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004058021962802261,"score_gpt":0.2204437609248885,"score_spread":0.2163857389620863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}