{"id":"W2329709516","doi":"10.1509/jppm.14.047","title":"The Effectiveness of Warning Labels for Consumers: A Meta-Analytic Investigation into Their Underlying Process and Contingencies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","topic":"Safety Warnings and Signage","field":"Psychology","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Recall; Comprehension; Psychology; Moderation; Set (abstract data type); Outcome (game theory); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05845597,0.002386327,0.009143176,0.005185598,0.0006898176,0.004003169,0.001949528,0.001916482,0.001885908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1530802,0.001318055,0.03067993,0.004849,0.001394939,0.00302227,0.001908652,0.002712922,0.0001829474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002689622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002258705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003109678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005033481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.964014,0.023471,0.006285776,0.002528799,0.003330651,0.0003697921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7954698,0.182795,0.01369454,0.004276709,0.003273898,0.0004901008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004965861,0.0001093128,0.01090898,0.1500981,0.8058395,0.0000690583,0.0004379191,0.0004950479,0.0003202916,0.0003941467,0.0003858939,0.02597575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007446688,0.0005873876,0.006807928,0.01160109,0.9777848,0.00003883491,0.0001044856,0.0002712367,0.0003179123,0.0005772831,0.001139134,0.00002527205],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03988899,0.9531009,0.003495063,0.0007519964,0.0003300675,0.0008740512,0.0005603551,0.00007388439,0.0009246059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6946661,0.2897911,0.01050505,0.001225122,0.0003971721,0.002126253,0.0008048451,0.00009054176,0.0003937435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05845597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3091484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1160346613472173,"score_gpt":0.3795347751364154,"score_spread":0.263500113789198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}