{"id":"W2329750810","doi":"10.1891/0730-0832.25.4.239","title":"Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Two Case Studies with Atypical Presentations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Neonatal Network The Journal of Neonatal Nursing","topic":"Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal University Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; Medicine; Pulmonary hypoplasia; Presentation (obstetrics); Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Respiratory distress; Diaphragmatic hernia; Pulmonary hypertension; Hypoplasia; Pediatrics; Diaphragmatic breathing; Hernia; Anesthesia; Surgery; Internal medicine; Pregnancy; Gestation; Fetus; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006430856,0.002620642,0.001698587,0.00542797,0.001061821,0.002296245,0.002420414,0.004668006,0.001967948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004850828,0.00107936,0.0009395159,0.004162639,0.002196408,0.004205442,0.001805606,0.001634101,0.001053845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007391108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007710611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001076918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001870511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99871,0.0001569176,0.0004317207,0.0002933656,0.0002055638,0.0002023743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975991,0.0009568263,0.000787588,0.0001314339,0.0002041941,0.0003208043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055171,0.00006762077,0.01268151,0.001083983,0.00005731823,0.9575483,0.0007169348,0.00009322238,0.001431726,0.0002972192,0.001422573,0.02454441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006149097,0.0000163429,0.003026351,0.0001755356,0.00005732646,0.9925599,0.0003311171,0.00003562385,0.0001964436,0.000147959,0.003428533,0.00001856374],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2268555,0.7440397,0.006623399,0.003183397,0.001216889,0.0003096061,0.0004143572,0.0002099426,0.01714709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6564917,0.3256299,0.007317424,0.002799898,0.003389305,0.0001276131,0.000485163,0.00006940687,0.003689675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00542797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006583393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05136130296276585,"score_gpt":0.382581973012618,"score_spread":0.3312206700498522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}