{"id":"W2329774485","doi":"10.1097/prs.0000000000000004","title":"A Methodological Analysis of the Plastic Surgery Cost-Utility Literature Using Established Guidelines","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cost–utility analysis; Cost–benefit analysis; Quality (philosophy); Point (geometry); Population; Plastic surgery; Surgery; Actuarial science; Medical physics; Operations management; Cost effectiveness; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4604444,0.003442103,0.006715288,0.07622328,0.003099554,0.01061329,0.005555678,0.003505399,0.005270848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7344549,0.002824746,0.01507319,0.05942484,0.004113161,0.005081208,0.007825572,0.003248146,0.0006173186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01529649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02806832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004119745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007127943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3230842,0.3744291,0.2345535,0.008375023,0.05745407,0.002104131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2023507,0.5709268,0.07816347,0.03497837,0.1125239,0.00105675],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002087946,0.0006534224,0.0703496,0.38791,0.04025958,0.001180534,0.01418648,0.007583791,0.002212912,0.0543158,0.01796272,0.4012972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005122113,0.003418815,0.09368994,0.5050827,0.1020753,0.002243536,0.01497788,0.02642083,0.009450015,0.0909511,0.1455221,0.001045667],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05047353,0.1630976,0.4454751,0.01076792,0.002181168,0.2964817,0.01312519,0.0006500987,0.01774773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1752404,0.02107027,0.5536579,0.002915188,0.0003981773,0.2426933,0.003093358,0.0001903697,0.0007410573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6653682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5847248556614195,"score_gpt":0.450265489370437,"score_spread":0.1344593662909825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}