{"id":"W2330442986","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2011-0342","title":"Landslide hazard assessment using digital elevation models","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Landslide; Hazard; Digital elevation model; Elevation (ballistics); Hazard analysis; Geology; Preparedness; Scale (ratio); Geotechnical engineering; Geography; Cartography; Remote sensing; Reliability engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002994387,0.0003012384,0.0002360527,0.00127329,0.000168033,0.0007508912,0.0004311268,0.0002814171,0.001521445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001560088,0.0001774884,0.0003128475,0.001339923,0.0001201345,0.0006982041,0.0004751676,0.0001764659,0.0003841752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005851979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000533111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01980901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03137784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998257,0.00003601854,0.00001369837,0.0000207113,0.00008668436,0.00001731681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997222,0.0000889401,0.00003793294,0.00004723136,0.00008664391,0.00001703471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004556606,0.00006295388,0.01669611,0.00005224084,0.00005492486,0.00009950008,0.00004952596,0.8689095,0.002388824,0.003690916,0.001368413,0.1065815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006016556,0.000009186865,0.005922205,0.000006110231,0.000007601129,0.00002665614,0.0000263067,0.9903316,0.0007458524,0.001593001,0.001314119,0.00001142029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3662603,0.0005910051,0.6029604,0.0003473593,0.00004095125,0.0002617224,0.006211494,0.003578218,0.01974846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9254007,0.0003018562,0.07138566,0.00001978107,0.000008429834,0.00006717636,0.001344429,0.00003934839,0.001432661],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01980901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0393874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01379288703970873,"score_gpt":0.2268098465868903,"score_spread":0.2130169595471816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}