{"id":"W2330570680","doi":"10.1111/bmsp.12066","title":"Testing for negligible interaction: A coherent and robust approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology","topic":"Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Contrast (vision); Type I and type II errors; Normality; Econometrics; Homoscedasticity; Statistical hypothesis testing; Interaction; Homogeneity (statistics); Statistics; Variance (accounting); Null hypothesis; Statistical power; Bootstrapping (finance); Computer science; Mathematics; Heteroscedasticity; Artificial intelligence; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2675881,0.00272036,0.006475872,0.00596123,0.002700916,0.006728586,0.006531767,0.00570748,0.006339961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6523181,0.001945507,0.00608848,0.004662245,0.01058431,0.008202677,0.009326665,0.008462206,0.001543969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002223338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005558774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008493682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005231944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5778459,0.3188587,0.01969713,0.03268224,0.04914054,0.00177557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3043425,0.5984319,0.02693899,0.05057423,0.0177178,0.001994523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003478781,0.0009184699,0.02316154,0.002929919,0.007873693,0.001482213,0.004207647,0.02349232,0.007375547,0.3767678,0.008536944,0.5397752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001739129,0.007279335,0.0161285,0.001391579,0.002860384,0.001641905,0.001195004,0.2259261,0.01281226,0.7014018,0.02697537,0.000648641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005855678,0.0003344679,0.990523,0.0005557053,0.0001263113,0.0008498931,0.00009804199,0.0003239824,0.001332972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1284285,0.0002236127,0.865645,0.0006555098,0.0002150836,0.004086684,0.0002000291,0.0002123743,0.0003331982],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7324119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9031942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5714294779352754,"score_gpt":0.5466511481811501,"score_spread":0.02477832975412531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}