{"id":"W2330650502","doi":"10.5849/jof.14-118","title":"A Rapid Forest Assessment Method for Multiparty Monitoring Across Landscapes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptive management; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Natural resource management; Transparency (behavior); Understory; Scale (ratio); Scope (computer science); Citizen science; Resource management (computing); Forest ecology; Computer science; Natural resource; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Ecosystem; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001286993,0.0005854431,0.0005827498,0.002026601,0.0005446199,0.000762619,0.000967645,0.0007484661,0.006629949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003671571,0.0004118575,0.0004226725,0.001282513,0.0001896322,0.001302459,0.001534134,0.0007285137,0.002001596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002989421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005467284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002786177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007709383,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99885,0.000236602,0.00006468042,0.0002440815,0.000521585,0.00008316274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977259,0.0006935907,0.0001855873,0.0005629138,0.0007294462,0.0001025652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003677394,0.0002330807,0.01409632,0.0001298178,0.0001484122,0.0001585719,0.0001972377,0.01860778,0.06727501,0.002831048,0.008733828,0.8872213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001678534,0.0002777638,0.04506676,0.00006808337,0.0002221992,0.001497679,0.0002610908,0.8657586,0.04690434,0.01490517,0.02468434,0.0001861252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03833788,0.0001426423,0.9517645,0.0000922882,0.00008221217,0.0003460512,0.001479684,0.003833305,0.003921444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2338656,0.00009016402,0.7587999,0.00006810288,0.00006732126,0.0006848146,0.00122036,0.0002872896,0.004916572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006629949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02217937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07777581261126397,"score_gpt":0.3811198097237952,"score_spread":0.3033439971125312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}