{"id":"W2330959049","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000170","title":"Validity of the youth assessment and screening instrument: A juvenile justice tool incorporating risks, needs, and strengths.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Juvenile; Legal psychology; Economic Justice; Juvenile delinquency; Risk assessment; Predictive validity; Scale (ratio); Protocol (science); Sample (material); Applied psychology; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Computer security; Computer science; Geography; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003815391,0.0002191304,0.00028604,0.00006909659,0.0004451355,0.00006137176,0.0001518456,0.0001137205,0.0000672385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001184597,0.0001463858,0.00004545115,0.00009377535,0.0004525125,0.0001574426,0.0001761508,0.0001994788,0.000001384653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002364483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001722715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006052454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002537339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986076,0.0001569822,0.0004051821,0.0003582965,0.0001994044,0.0002725548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990204,0.0001183942,0.0003284603,0.0003962621,0.00003324682,0.0001032437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004322044,0.0002531702,0.7559177,0.00005779219,0.00004496844,0.000006627235,0.003020129,9.206753e-8,0.00356294,0.2063737,0.0007638861,0.02995584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002775072,0.0004577514,0.9870413,0.0002517888,0.0006796209,0.00004159002,0.005590454,0.000002773829,0.0002195001,0.001394809,0.001187067,0.0003582901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902368,0.00009047626,0.00008024088,0.0001073278,0.004139584,0.0003353995,0.000156395,0.00003750652,0.004816242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986564,0.0000065099,0.0006496746,0.0001363144,0.000292025,0.00003213609,0.000007833144,0.00002711028,0.0001919893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2311236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5969439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08964297781733248,"score_gpt":0.3610202740619783,"score_spread":0.2713772962446458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}