{"id":"W2330959049","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000170","title":"Validity of the youth assessment and screening instrument: A juvenile justice tool incorporating risks, needs, and strengths.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Juvenile; Legal psychology; Economic Justice; Juvenile delinquency; Risk assessment; Predictive validity; Scale (ratio); Protocol (science); Sample (material); Applied psychology; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Computer security; Computer science; Geography; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004531487,0.0006282796,0.0005482608,0.003128097,0.0008887639,0.0007447078,0.0009703033,0.0003435971,0.001493074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01075042,0.0003080011,0.0008555546,0.001625316,0.0005091247,0.0007076134,0.00174263,0.0008666339,0.0003672169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002190124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005281725,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07801045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1945687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980503,0.0003495207,0.0002720889,0.0001186526,0.001034315,0.0001751519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953694,0.0006955278,0.001513186,0.0001665266,0.001706727,0.000548521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007808004,0.0002033646,0.944648,0.00009811809,0.00006007124,0.0001007965,0.0006925558,0.0003357454,0.0005086731,0.0003626028,0.002815232,0.05009673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001319729,0.0001306973,0.9960334,0.00006078406,0.00002351283,0.0001784522,0.0003687709,0.0006505075,0.0002640062,0.0001553664,0.002108016,0.00001327482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724177,0.0009314271,0.004728285,0.0004109943,0.0001165453,0.002454969,0.005086721,0.0001724949,0.01368092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962888,0.0006794454,0.02407398,0.0001481557,0.00002529374,0.002186772,0.006052421,0.00002894697,0.003917072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07801045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1551127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08964297781733248,"score_gpt":0.3610202740619783,"score_spread":0.2713772962446458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}