{"id":"W2331252176","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjd.2012.07.359","title":"Patients Treated with Liraglutide Are More Likely to Reach Target HbA1c Compared with Sitagliptin or Exenatide BID","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Diabetes","topic":"Diabetes Treatment and Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liraglutide; Exenatide; Medicine; Sitagliptin; Type 2 diabetes; Post-hoc analysis; Internal medicine; Hazard ratio; Proportional hazards model; Incidence (geometry); Cumulative incidence; Urology; Diabetes mellitus; Endocrinology; Confidence interval; Cohort","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003517481,0.0001607181,0.0006732438,0.0002320718,0.0003420343,0.000653261,0.0001289251,0.0004016291,0.005834761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001847827,0.0001501488,0.001197256,0.0003584474,0.0001236497,0.0004481159,0.0002026408,0.000831739,0.0005798755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001995445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003682507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002233967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002985331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997576,0.00006932611,0.00002878019,0.00004654978,0.00004404492,0.00005371154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990054,0.0003288263,0.0003859599,0.0000425475,0.00004289977,0.0001944196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01958503,0.0006970524,0.9080564,0.0001304501,0.0008976415,0.0006031864,0.0001391461,0.0003126742,0.00424846,0.0002466532,0.003400629,0.06168272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007463187,0.00224945,0.9885162,0.00004994848,0.0007700796,0.001752591,0.0003272671,0.001027907,0.0005099183,0.000413541,0.003603112,0.00003378262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936333,0.001567214,0.0002159768,0.0005966306,0.0001224724,0.00001553988,0.000305189,0.0000248123,0.003518861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968848,0.0004382425,0.0002137596,0.0006555394,0.00007798547,0.000009231231,0.0003909517,0.000009290279,0.001320113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005834761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01951921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01459704525779765,"score_gpt":0.2201504195842965,"score_spread":0.2055533743264989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}