{"id":"W2331724105","doi":"10.1103/physreve.85.026411","title":"Magnetic-field-line random walk in turbulence: A two-point correlation function description","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review E","topic":"Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Random walk; Turbulence; Statistical physics; Decorrelation; Physics; Correlation function (quantum field theory); Random field; Line (geometry); Field line; Field (mathematics); Function (biology); Heterogeneous random walk in one dimension; Stochastic process; Magnetic field; Mathematics; Mechanics; Quantum mechanics; Statistics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001474486,0.0008513251,0.0009533909,0.001579843,0.0005438505,0.001926888,0.001556877,0.001893493,0.002020509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021651,0.0003326699,0.0008576522,0.001173421,0.001486435,0.002878011,0.0007532961,0.001022545,0.0007587615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007706147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001845369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001012914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995975,0.0001293833,0.00002189137,0.00006590717,0.0001137212,0.00007160736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990416,0.0003828479,0.0001606283,0.0001417108,0.0001567396,0.000116401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001790326,0.00002301627,0.000509625,0.00004336775,0.00001493729,0.000164102,0.00004952431,0.05642065,0.001405016,0.9381319,0.00102907,0.002190944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001202916,0.00002183661,0.0005603326,0.00001313158,0.00000819469,0.0001176361,0.0000135633,0.757652,0.0001869926,0.2402197,0.00116832,0.00002614986],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1236865,0.003259149,0.8476818,0.001695192,0.0002793823,0.00009000997,0.0005746024,0.0004493287,0.0222841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398386,0.002819583,0.04010643,0.0004328616,0.000478025,0.0001659482,0.0005536209,0.0002145624,0.01539037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002020509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007797897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01179750033534247,"score_gpt":0.2717827730732455,"score_spread":0.259985272737903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}