{"id":"W2332423003","doi":"10.1139/f2011-097","title":"Stocked trout do not significantly affect wood frog populations in boreal foothills lakes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Trout; Biology; Stocking; Ecology; Trophic level; Boreal; Forage fish; Population; Brown trout; Abundance (ecology); Fishery; Predation; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003082414,0.0001623262,0.0001568839,0.0004740997,0.0005986391,0.000535414,0.0002416817,0.00018748,0.0009533892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001019407,0.0001760033,0.00024145,0.0003702772,0.0005998519,0.0003786377,0.0004881965,0.0001678032,0.00005509437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001190662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008135751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1301398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4503168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999764,0.00005031608,0.00001747665,0.0000476743,0.00004849984,0.00007199655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999303,0.00005840255,0.0003453711,0.00002331256,0.00007132105,0.0001986394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002106177,0.00006611206,0.9914684,0.0000143079,0.00007141905,0.0001154161,0.0005264661,0.0001003552,0.004810618,0.00002533115,0.00008767786,0.002503297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002392381,0.00003940721,0.9996575,7.484938e-7,0.000005746544,0.00001059237,0.0001702431,0.0000229778,0.00005445819,0.000004203042,0.00003070199,9.58099e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998086,0.00002539871,0.000008014383,0.000006867143,6.94222e-7,0.000001208776,0.00001987745,0.000001219168,0.0001281831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997856,0.00002092048,0.00002505055,0.00001170521,0.000001107044,0.000002530404,0.00004042149,8.463659e-7,0.0001118676],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8698602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2587646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04638037484553172,"score_gpt":0.2379815667790652,"score_spread":0.1916011919335335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}