{"id":"W2332495559","doi":"10.5558/tfc2013-010","title":"Re-examining wood supply in light of future spruce budworm outbreaks: A case study in New Brunswick","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of New Brunswick; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Spruce budworm; Choristoneura fumiferana; Outbreak; PEST analysis; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Geography; Forestry; Biology; Tortricidae; Horticulture","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005815016,0.0001992852,0.0002768873,0.00005321639,0.00006255117,0.00003494125,0.0004908078,0.00009537717,0.0009228491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003651194,0.0001453395,0.00004018303,0.000513997,0.00007240364,0.0003605505,0.0002890741,0.0003115831,0.0004333954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003894257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001207706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1970841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3694059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982783,0.0001775362,0.000438235,0.000343741,0.000299164,0.000463084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989408,0.0001246637,0.0001457451,0.000676069,0.000005090917,0.0001075788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002432893,0.0003887054,0.9774511,0.00003145875,0.00001297805,0.0004922906,0.01027455,0.0009405173,0.001504523,0.00002293206,0.001704369,0.007152186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002204445,0.0005924869,0.9740712,0.00009858586,0.00001316649,0.0002450584,0.01461281,0.005862528,0.001338837,0.00008159405,0.0006130512,0.0002662339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957625,0.0002084853,0.000002311903,0.0005984818,0.0001567358,0.001271614,0.000001421046,0.00003024442,0.001968187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992977,0.000004764415,0.00006844113,0.00006603879,0.000130679,0.0000358485,0.000001026027,0.00002745497,0.0003680135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1723218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009455948052122777,"score_gpt":0.2270865594964465,"score_spread":0.2176306114443237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}